ood detector
- North America > United States > Nevada (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (12 more...)
- North America > United States > Nevada (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (12 more...)
Rethinking Out-of-Distribution Detection on Imbalanced Data Distribution
Detecting and rejecting unknown out-of-distribution (OOD) samples is critical for deployed neural networks to void unreliable predictions. In real-world scenarios, however, the efficacy of existing OOD detection methods is often impeded by the inherent imbalance of in-distribution (ID) data, which causes significant performance decline. Through statistical observations, we have identified two common challenges faced by different OOD detectors: misidentifying tail class ID samples as OOD, while erroneously predicting OOD samples as head class from ID. To explain this phenomenon, we introduce a generalized statistical framework, termed ImOOD, to formulate the OOD detection problem on imbalanced data distribution. Consequently, the theoretical analysis reveals that there exists a class-aware bias item between balanced and imbalanced OOD detection, which contributes to the performance gap. Building upon this finding, we present a unified training-time regularization technique to mitigate the bias and boost imbalanced OOD detectors across architecture designs. Our theoretically grounded method translates into consistent improvements on the representative CIFAR10-LT, CIFAR100-LT, and ImageNet-LT benchmarks against several state-of-the-art OOD detection approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/alibaba/imood.
Not All Out-of-Distribution Data Are Harmful to Open-Set Active Learning
Active learning (AL) methods have been proven to be an effective way to reduce the labeling effort by intelligently selecting valuable instances for annotation. Despite their great success with in-distribution (ID) scenarios, AL methods suffer from performance degradation in many real-world applications because out-of-distribution (OOD) instances are always inevitably contained in unlabeled data, which may lead to inefficient sampling. Therefore, several attempts have been explored open-set AL by strategically selecting pure ID instances while filtering OOD instances. However, concentrating solely on selecting pseudo-ID instances may cause the training constraint of the ID classifier and OOD detector. To address this issue, we propose a simple yet effective sampling scheme, Progressive Active Learning (PAL), which employs a progressive sampling mechanism to leverage the active selection of valuable OOD instances. The proposed PAL measures unlabeled instances by synergistically evaluating instances' informativeness and representativeness, and thus it can balance the pseudo-ID and pseudo-OOD instances in each round to enhance both the capacity of the ID classifier and the OOD detector.
Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detection A Detailed Experimental Results We report the performance of OOD detectors on each of the six OOD test datasets in Table 4 (CIFAR-10) and Table 5 (CIFAR-100)
The Maha-lanobis score is calculated using the features of the second-to-last layer. Bold numbers are superior results. We fine-tune the models once with a fixed random seed. OE [15], reported performance for each OOD dataset is averaged over 10 random batches of samples. The Maha-lanobis scores are calculated from the features of the second-to-last layer.
- North America > United States > Nevada (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (12 more...)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (14 more...)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Unsupervised or Indirectly Supervised Learning (0.30)
Buffer-free Class-Incremental Learning with Out-of-Distribution Detection
Gupta, Srishti, Angioni, Daniele, Pintor, Maura, Demontis, Ambra, Schönherr, Lea, Biggio, Battista, Roli, Fabio
Class-incremental learning (CIL) poses significant challenges in open-world scenarios, where models must not only learn new classes over time without forgetting previous ones but also handle inputs from unknown classes that a closed-set model would misclassify. Recent works address both issues by (i)~training multi-head models using the task-incremental learning framework, and (ii) predicting the task identity employing out-of-distribution (OOD) detectors. While effective, the latter mainly relies on joint training with a memory buffer of past data, raising concerns around privacy, scalability, and increased training time. In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of post-hoc OOD detection methods and investigate their potential to eliminate the need for a memory buffer. We uncover that these methods, when applied appropriately at inference time, can serve as a strong substitute for buffer-based OOD detection. We show that this buffer-free approach achieves comparable or superior performance to buffer-based methods both in terms of class-incremental learning and the rejection of unknown samples. Experimental results on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Tiny ImageNet datasets support our findings, offering new insights into the design of efficient and privacy-preserving CIL systems for open-world settings.
- Europe > Italy > Sardinia > Cagliari (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Europe > Romania > Sud - Muntenia Development Region > Giurgiu County > Giurgiu (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Saarland > Saarbrücken (0.04)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Education (0.82)
- Law (0.67)